For another 75 years and beyond

Statement by Nan Hayworth on the 75th Anniversary of Social Security

Social Security represents the aspiration within the American character to do right by our neighbors and our fellow citizens.  When Social Security was signed into law 75 years ago, our government was prepared to finance the program responsibly.  Much has changed during the intervening decades to create an ever greater role for Social Security, and that in turn demands that we anticipate future needs so that we can continue this program that is critically important for tens of millions of Americans.

Our most pressing obligation is to assure that the benefits that have been promised to those receiving them today, and that are anticipated by those who will soon be eligible, will be reliably financed.  In the early days of Social Security, more than 40 workers were paying into the system for each beneficiary.  Today there are only 3 workers per beneficiary, and unemployment continues to grow in a sagging economy.  In addition, the Social Security Trust Fund has been raided repeatedly for other government spending, which means that its future soundness depends upon the nation’s ability to pay back the Treasury bond “IOUs” it currently holds.  Some people fear significant changes in Social Security, such as “privatization,” and it’s important to know that we can preserve benefits without mandating a radical restructuring.

Instead, it’s imperative that we preserve Social Security by reviving our private sector, and that begins by taking a growing federal government off the backs of the employers and businesses that are the source of our economic strength.  I’ve proposed immediate suspension of the massive new national health law that is already penalizing employers for hiring, and I repeat that call today.  I call as well for the permanent extension of the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts; for elimination of the estate tax and the Alternative Minimum Tax; and for reduction of capital-gains and corporate taxes.  We need to keep dollars out of the massive tax-and-spend government system and allow them to remain in free enterprise, so that Americans can renew the robust economic growth that has enabled generations to rise from poverty to prosperity.

We can put Social Security on a sound footing by doing what we’ve always done best as a nation:  working together to realize the dream and potential of a free people.


5 Responses to For another 75 years and beyond

  1. Michael Minard says:

    How is giving more money to the very wealthiest Americans going to keep Social Security secure? There has never been a correspondence between tax breaks for the wealthy and even something as simple as research and development in industry. It usually means, with the exception of truly philanthropic people like George Soros, that the richest are made more comfortable (materially anyway).

  2. Mark says:

    All modern pension plans are effectively Ponzi schemes. All insurance eventually leads to increased risks taken. Social Security, therefore, needs to be wound down. An estate tax would be the fairest approach since once you are dead, you no longer need whatever wealth you created. Also, there is no question that future voters should not be stuck with their parents’ / grandparents’ bill. Each generation needs to pay their own way.

    Recipients of Sosial Security payouts would receive a variable share of the estate taxes collected. The distributions would eventually end, yet the estate taxes would specifically be applied to paying down Federal and State debts.

  3. Rowan says:

    So are you in favor of privatizing Social Secutiy or not? I read elsewhere that the Club for Growth endorsed you because you are? But it doesn’t say so here – I’m confused.

  4. Rowan says:

    Can you please confirm that you do not want to privatize Social Security? This does not suggest that but the Club for Growth has endorsed you by suggesting that you DO want to prvatize it.

  5. Nan Hayworth says:

    Rowan, the answer is no.

    The reason you’re confused is because that’s not at all why CFG endorsed me; the reasons for their endorsement are listed in their profile of me on their website: they know I have pledged to work to roll back the federal takeover of health care, that I will not accept the shady practice of earmarking, and that I am opposed to raising taxes, especially in a recession.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: